Industry-leading prices on quality products. Check out what's on sale today!
SHOP NOWClassic Firearms hosts a live Battlefield 6 stream where Brandon and Josh compare in‑game firearms, optics, and accessories to their real‑world counterparts while answering viewer questions about pistols, rifles, and competition‑focused double‑stack 1911‑style platforms.
The stream opens with Brandon from Classic Firearms introducing the live Battlefield 6 session and welcoming Josh. They explain that the focus is comparing Battlefield 6 firearms to their real‑life counterparts, including optics and accessories, and invite viewers to ask anything about how the in‑game setups contrast with real firearms. Brandon mentions running an EOTech on a SCAR and a heavily customized M4, along with a 1911‑style pistol he jokingly nicknames based on a friend’s gun from a previous video. Josh plans to run an MP5 with a small red dot he jokingly calls a T‑point or T2‑style optic, noting it has been a long day and they are having fun with the names. They mention they are on John’s account, which has very few unlocks, while Brandon’s usual account is around level 70. Brandon sets up an assault loadout with an M4, an EOTech, and a thermal grenade launcher, plus a rocket launcher for dealing with tanks, and also references a support loadout built around an RPK and a Glock‑style pistol. They joke about helping John’s stats and seeing who does better by the end of the match while queuing into a mode with vehicles and objectives.
A viewer asks for thoughts on Rock Island 1911 pistols. Josh answers that Rock Island has been making 1911s for years and that their guns are generally well‑fit and tight, which is desirable in that platform. He says they tend to be solid performers for the money. Brandon recalls shooting a very small Rock Island 1911 variant, describing it as a miniature model that was accurate enough but difficult to control because of its extremely short grip. He notes that even with relatively small hands, the abbreviated grip made it hard to get a solid purchase on the pistol, and they joke about having "baby hands." The conversation highlights how compact 1911s can be less comfortable to shoot than full‑size models, despite being based on the same design.
As the match starts, Brandon chooses the assault role and equips an M4 with an EOTech optic, a thermal grenade launcher, and a 1911‑style sidearm. He mentions also having a support setup built around an RPK and a Glock‑style pistol on his usual account. Josh initially runs an MP5 and later considers switching to an M4 with an EOTech as well to build time on that optic. They discuss using rocket launchers against tanks and coordinating on objectives like point A and B. Brandon comments on the high rate of fire on the in‑game M4 and how effective it feels in close‑quarters fights, especially compared to trying to run pistol‑only against opponents using full‑auto rifles and shotguns. Throughout the gameplay, they compare how the M4, SCAR, and MP5 feel in Battlefield 6 versus their expectations from real‑world shooting experience.
A viewer asks for recommendations on a 2011 pistol in the $2,500 range, later expanding the budget to $2,500–$3,500 for competitive shooting. Josh notes that his suggestion may be a bit controversial and references a model he has shot and liked, but clarifies he is not a dedicated 2011 enthusiast. He has experience with several high‑end 2011s, including offerings from Staccato, Sand Viper‑type pistols, and Nighthawk 2011s. He describes himself primarily as a Glock shooter, which shapes his preferences in grip angle, trigger feel, and recoil impulse. When asked specifically about Staccato, he says the company (formerly STI) has been around a long time and is essentially the standard reference when people think of 2011s. He considers Staccato a solid option for someone entering competition within that price bracket and notes that they tend to be reliable, well‑supported, and easy to tune for different roles like carry, range use, or competition.
The discussion shifts to other 2011‑style pistols such as the Springfield Prodigy. Josh recalls that early Prodigy pistols had some reliability issues, and they experienced a few problems with their initial examples. However, he notes that more recent Prodigy pistols have run much better over the last few years, with far fewer hiccups, and that Springfield appears to have addressed many of the early concerns. For shooters on a tighter budget, he mentions a more affordable imported 2011‑style competition model as a strong value, calling it one of the best options for the money in that segment. They frame Staccato and Springfield Prodigy as common choices in the roughly $2,500 range, with the budget‑oriented import serving as a more accessible entry point into double‑stack 1911/2011‑type pistols for competition or range use. They emphasize that buyers should consider intended use, willingness to tune or upgrade parts, and local support when choosing among these platforms.
A viewer asks about the GForce Blade series, specifically the Blade 6 and Blade 8. Josh says he has limited direct time on the Blade but offers general impressions based on what he has seen and heard. He describes the Blade as a pistol‑caliber carbine option that is reasonably priced for someone wanting a PCC without spending a lot. They estimate the Blade 6 price around the low‑$400 range and note that the Blade 8 has received better feedback than the 6 from what they have heard, particularly in terms of reliability and overall feel. Josh also mentions the GForce Jawbone, another platform that has generated interest, though he has not personally used it. The Jawbone is described as having a polymer magwell and using Glock magazines, which appeals to shooters already invested in Glock pistols and magazines because it simplifies logistics and training.
While answering questions, they continue playing Battlefield 6 in Breakthrough mode, where teams capture sectors and push forward. Brandon and Josh coordinate on objectives like A and B, calling out enemy positions, revives, and vehicle threats. They repeatedly comment on the M4’s fast cyclic rate in game and how quickly it can clear rooms or hallways when paired with an EOTech. They encounter tanks, use rocket launchers, and deal with opponents running shotguns and light machine guns. At one point, Brandon is surprised by how quickly a building collapses around him under sustained fire and explosives. The gameplay commentary emphasizes how the in‑game M4 and LMGs feel in terms of rate of fire, recoil, and suppression compared to expectations from real‑world platforms, and they note where the game exaggerates or simplifies certain characteristics for balance.
Later in the stream, they ask viewers to share their favorite 2011 pistols, noting that 2011s are a major topic of interest among enthusiasts. Josh explains that 2011s are popular because they tend to be very soft‑shooting and controllable, with excellent triggers and high capacity. He recalls shooting an Atlas 2011 owned by a colleague named Kaya and describes it as one of the smoothest pistols he has ever handled, with a very flat recoil impulse and fast return to target. He compares its feel to a Nighthawk 2011 he previously shot, saying the Atlas reminded him strongly of that Nighthawk in terms of smooth cycling and overall refinement. He mentions first experiencing a Nighthawk through a coworker named Kenzie and later shooting another at a concealed‑carry‑focused event. The segment underscores how high‑end 2011s like Atlas and Nighthawk stand out for their shooting characteristics, fit, and finish, even among other premium pistols, and why many competitive shooters gravitate toward them.
Loading... 
