The video opens by introducing Eliza, a lifelong martial artist with a brown belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu, kickboxing experience, and time spent in MMA. Her work teaching women’s self-defense led her to confront the realities of size and strength differences, ultimately pushing her toward firearms as an equalizer and into women-focused concealed carry instruction around Charlotte. The hosts frame the episode as a concealed carry showdown between four popular slim pistols: the Glock 43X, Sig Sauer P365 X Macro, Smith & Wesson M&P Shield X, and Springfield Armory Hellcat Pro. They highlight shared traits like slim profiles, optics-ready slides, improved triggers, and accessory rails, while noting the Shield X’s M&P lineage and under-marketed strengths. Early on, they stress the importance of actually shooting prospective carry guns before buying, explaining that recoil and ergonomics can feel very different in the hand than they look on paper or in marketing materials.
The hosts outline a structured test plan to keep the comparison fair. Each shooter will rotate through all four pistols, starting with the Sig P365 X Macro, then moving to the Glock 43X, Hellcat Pro, and Shield X. They discuss using red dots versus co-witnessing irons, agreeing that shooters can choose whichever sighting method feels most natural while still trying to keep the evaluation consistent. On the range, the P365 Macro’s strengths show up quickly: high capacity in a compact footprint, solid ergonomics, and a long sight radius. However, they immediately notice that while the recoil is controllable, it is also sharp and more pronounced than expected, especially when tracking the dot and irons together. This early live-fire segment sets a baseline for how the other pistols’ recoil impulses and muzzle behavior will be judged throughout the rest of the video.
Attention shifts to the Glock 43X, where the hosts note its factory 10-round capacity and the common upgrade path to 15-round Shield Arms magazines. They mention rumors of a Checkmate or Mec-Gar 15-round option, underscoring how many owners feel compelled to boost capacity. On the line, the 43X’s recoil is described as more violent and snappy than the Sig P365 Macro, with a sharper impulse that makes fast follow-up shots harder. The group then moves to the Springfield Hellcat Pro, set up as a personal carry gun with a Swampfox optic that the owner plans to replace. Immediately, shooters remark that the Hellcat Pro’s recoil impulse is noticeably softer than both the Glock 43X and the P365 Macro. Its dense, aggressive stipple pattern provides excellent traction without being overly abrasive, helping them control the gun during rapid strings. These back-to-back comparisons start to separate the field in terms of shootability.
The Smith & Wesson M&P Shield X finally gets its turn on the firing line. Shooters comment on its comfortable feel in the hand and the presence of a thumb safety that stays out of the way when not used, avoiding interference during the draw or firing grip. The optics-ready slide cuts are praised as modern and practical, aligning the Shield X with current concealed carry expectations. However, they immediately notice that the slide feels heavy to drop using the slide release, hinting at the stiff controls that will be discussed later. A humorous moment arises when an empty magazine leads to playful banter about who was supposed to reload and who is up next to shoot. With initial impressions of all four pistols now established, the group heads back to the bench to begin ranking the guns from least favorite to top choice based on recoil, ergonomics, capacity, and overall carry suitability.
When the rankings begin, the Glock 43X unanimously lands in fourth place. The panel criticizes its grip shape for high-hand shooters, explaining that without an extended beavertail, the slide can cause slide bite. They describe the recoil as notably snappy, with a harsh impulse that makes it the least pleasant of the four to shoot quickly. Another major complaint is capacity: in 2025, a factory 10-round micro-compact feels outdated, especially when competitors offer higher capacities out of the box. The hosts also point out that the 43X often becomes a project gun, with owners replacing barrels, slides, grip frames, fire control units, mag catches, triggers, and sights to reach its potential. While they acknowledge Glock’s strong reliability record, they argue that requiring extensive aftermarket work undermines its value compared to pistols that feel refined and capable in stock configuration.
The discussion moves to third-place picks, where the Sig P365 X Macro is frequently chosen. Panelists praise Sig’s overall product quality, the Macro’s generous capacity, and its good grip length and ergonomics. However, they consistently describe its recoil impulse as sharp, with a higher bore axis and slide movement that feels harsher than the remaining contenders. This makes fast follow-up shots more demanding, even though the gun remains accurate. One panelist instead places the Hellcat Pro in third, not because of inaccuracy, but due to how the front of the gun feels bouncy during rapid fire. They note that the muzzle takes longer to settle back to its natural resting point on quick double taps, which slightly slows their cadence. Despite this critique, they still shoot the Hellcat Pro well, underscoring how close the competition is among the top three pistols in the lineup.
For second place, two panelists select the S&W M&P Shield X. They highlight its relatively soft recoil and smooth shooting characteristics, noting that once they adjusted to the trigger, it felt very workable for a concealed carry gun. The Shield X’s ergonomics earn praise, but there are caveats: the grip feels slightly too short and very slim, with an egg-shaped front that may not fill larger hands. The external thumb safety is viewed as an unnecessary potential failure point for experienced carriers, though it can offer peace of mind for beginners. A recurring criticism is the characteristically stiff slide release and slide catch on M&P pistols. The hosts explain that some examples may loosen with break-in, but out of the box, the controls can make slide manipulation more difficult compared to designs like the Glock 19M, which emphasize easy overhand operation and more forgiving slide levers.
The conversation shifts to the Sig P365 Macro’s design and then to why the Hellcat Pro ultimately wins. The Macro is praised for its long sight radius, bright X-Ray sights, optic compatibility, and modular grip module system. Yet its light grip module concentrates mass in the slide, contributing to a snappy feel. In contrast, the Hellcat Pro stands out for its smooth recoil impulse and comfortable grip, enhanced here by an aftermarket stippling job that improves traction without being overly aggressive. The trigger is described as good and predictable, and the factory sights—featuring a high-visibility front—are considered strong out of the box, especially compared to Glock’s often-criticized plastic sights. The hosts recommend the Hellcat Pro and the M&P Shield X as especially good fits for women’s hands and brand-new concealed carriers, with the M&P’s external safety framed as added reassurance for those just starting to carry.
In the final stretch, one host emphasizes carrying the Hellcat Pro as a primary concealed carry weapon, expressing clear trust in its reliability and performance. They compare it to the Pro Comp version, noting that while the compensated model shoots exceptionally well, it is not their preference for daily concealed carry. The Hellcat Pro’s trigger is likened to a Glock’s but with a crisper break, and its recoil impulse remains manageable even with a 17-round magazine. The tritium front sight and three-dot setup support accurate shooting for all testers. The hosts reiterate the importance of shooting prospective carry guns before purchasing, sharing that one of them bought a Sig without trying the Hellcat Pro or Shield first. They also explain that defensive ammunition, such as heavier 148-grain loads, can increase felt recoil by roughly 25–35% compared to 124-grain ball. The video closes with lighthearted banter, a corrected slip calling it the “Hellcrap Cat Pro,” and appreciative thanks to viewers.
Loading...