Industry-leading prices on quality products. Check out what's on sale today!
SHOP NOWPart two of this Classic Firearms series tackles five more widely repeated gun myths, using real-world examples and clear technical breakdowns. The video covers how suppressors actually work and their legal status, what mil-spec really indicates, how commercial rifles compare to issued standards, common misconceptions about 9mm vs .45 ACP performance, and the truth behind M855 green tip ammunition claims.
The video opens as a continuation of a series on debunking popular gun myths. The host briefly recaps topics from the previous episode, including the M1 Garand “ping,” transparent magazines, the idea that 5.56 was designed only to injure rather than immediately incapacitate, the belief that racking a shotgun will automatically scare away a home invader, and the so‑called porcelain Glock myth. Viewers are encouraged to watch part one for those discussions. The host then introduces this episode as part two, focused on additional myths sourced from a favorite Facebook group, “Mid-Tier Gun Snobs – Don’t Be Poor v3.0,” and transitions into the next set of myths to be examined in detail.
The first myth addressed is that silencers are only for assassins, are simply illegal, or require a special license to own. The host explains that a silencer is a muzzle device that attaches to the firearm, either threading directly onto the barrel or mounting over a quick-detach muzzle device. Using a Huxworks Flow 762 as an example, the video notes that modern suppressors are designed as “mufflers” for guns, not as tools for secretive killing. They do not completely silence a firearm and are legal to own in many places with proper paperwork. Rather than a special license, ownership in the United States involves paying a $200 tax and obtaining an approved tax stamp under existing regulations.
The discussion moves into how silencers function. When a bullet exits the barrel, it is driven by hot, high‑pressure gases. A silencer contains baffles and chambers that trap and slow these gases, reducing the sharp report at the muzzle. The Huxworks Flow 762 is highlighted for its flow‑through design, which vents gases forward in a way that also helps keep the suppressor tightened on the barrel. The host breaks down the different sounds from a shot: the primer ignition, hot gases hitting cold air, the supersonic crack of a projectile breaking the sound barrier, and the mechanical noise of the firearm cycling. Suppressors reduce overall noise but do not eliminate it, especially with supersonic ammunition. Movie portrayals, such as quiet gunfights in public spaces, are contrasted with real‑world suppressed fire, which still produces noticeable sound and bullet impact noise. Subsonic calibers like .300 Blackout and .22 LR can be made very quiet, but hearing protection may still be advisable depending on the setup.
The next myth is that “mil-spec” automatically means a firearm or part is tougher than anything else and inherently superior. The host cites a definition from Guns & Ammo, explaining that mil-spec stands for military specification: a set of criteria for dimensions, materials, and testing that a part or weapon must meet to be approved by a U.S. government inspector. Mil-spec simply indicates that an item meets the minimum requirements for military issue, not that it is the highest performing option available. The concept applies broadly, from rifles to radios, aircraft, and even MREs, which are also built to a military specification. An FN M16 clone is used as an example of a mil-spec style rifle, with the main difference from an issued rifle being the lack of a third selector position or burst capability.
The host contrasts mil-spec rifles with commercial offerings. Mil-spec is described as a baseline that meets government needs at scale and cost, not a guarantee of best ergonomics or accuracy. The A2 pistol grip is cited as a mil-spec component that many shooters find uncomfortable. Some issued rifles show noticeable play between upper and lower receivers, with visible gaps that would be considered poor fit in the commercial market. By comparison, many commercial manufacturers build rifles with tighter tolerances and higher accuracy expectations, such as striving for sub‑MOA performance at distance, whereas a military specification might only require a larger group size, for example around 4 MOA at 500 yards. The point is that mil-spec can be adequate and durable, but commercial rifles often exceed those standards in areas like ergonomics, precision, and overall refinement.
Attention then turns to handgun caliber myths, specifically the claim that 9mm will “blow your lung out” and that .45 ACP is inherently more effective than 9mm. The host notes that 9mm has been in use for over a century, with extensive real‑world data from wars and law enforcement incidents. While 9mm can certainly damage or puncture organs, the idea that it will physically blow a lung out of the body is dismissed as unrealistic. The video compares 9mm and .45 ACP side by side, pointing out that .45 ACP is a larger, fatter projectile traveling at a slower velocity, while 9mm is smaller but faster. Both are foreign objects entering the body at significant speed, and neither guarantees a particular outcome based solely on caliber.
The host emphasizes that shot placement is more important than choosing between 9mm and .45 ACP when discussing how effective a handgun round may be. A 9mm round striking a vital area is more likely to be incapacitating than a .45 ACP round hitting a non‑critical location, and the reverse is also true. Modern defensive loads, including hollow points and improved bullet designs, have increased the performance of both calibers. The widespread adoption of 9mm by many law enforcement agencies and militaries is mentioned as context, without dismissing .45 ACP’s capability. The notion of “knockdown power” is briefly referenced as another oversimplified concept. Overall, the segment concludes that neither caliber is universally superior in all situations; results depend heavily on where the round impacts and the specific ammunition used.
The final myth covered in the available transcript is that M855 green tip 5.56 ammunition is armor piercing. The host explains that 5.56×45 mm comes in many variants, including true armor‑piercing loads, precision rounds like Black Hills Mk 262 77‑grain, frangible rounds, tracers, and blanks. M855, identified as the standard issue green tip with the A59 DODIC designation, is clarified as not being classified as armor piercing. It is a common military cartridge with a specific construction and performance profile, but it does not fall into the same group as dedicated armor‑piercing 5.56 ammunition. The segment aims to separate the reputation of green tip rounds from their actual specification and intended role.
Loading... 
