Industry-leading prices on quality products. Check out what's on sale today!
SHOP NOWClassic Firearms discusses Glock’s decision to discontinue most double-stack models and introduce the new V line. The conversation covers catalog simplification, regulatory speculation, and what owners can expect from future Glock pistols.
The hosts open by explaining Glock’s recent announcement that many current production models are being discontinued. Glock plans to end production of most double-stack pistols at the end of November, including staples like the Glock 17, 19, 47, and 49. Any model that uses a standard double-stack magazine, even 10-round versions, is affected. In contrast, the slim single-stack and staggered-slim pistols such as the Glock 48, 43X, and 43 will remain in production. The discussion frames this as a major shift for Glock’s catalog, prompting concern and speculation among owners who rely on the traditional double-stack lineup.
The conversation turns to Glock’s stated reasons for the change. Glock says it wants to simplify its catalog and streamline production so it can focus on future innovation. The hosts note that Glock has long promoted the idea of “perfection,” but suggest that real perfection may be the willingness to adapt while keeping what works. They also address speculation that regulatory pressures and concerns about unauthorized modifications may be influencing the decision. According to this view, Glock could be revising internal designs to better align with changing legal environments and to protect the brand’s reputation, while keeping the external appearance of the pistols largely the same.
The hosts emphasize that these changes are not expected to alter the basic performance characteristics that Glock users rely on. They argue that Glock pistols are already known for dependable function, and that any internal updates are unlikely to change how they shoot for the average owner. For someone who simply recognizes the Glock name and buys one off the shelf, the experience should remain familiar. They acknowledge that some enthusiasts are attached to older generations, especially Gen 3 models with extensive aftermarket support, but point out that similar configurations and parts will still be available through other brands and the existing market. The core reliability and utilitarian nature of Glock pistols remains the central expectation.
Attention shifts to the new V models that will replace many of the discontinued double-stack pistols. Glock is rolling out V versions of several popular models, and earlier rumors that there would be no MOS options are addressed. The hosts clarify that MOS variants are planned within the V line, though they will not be the first versions released. Some of these MOS-equipped V models are expected to be exclusive to certain distributors. The discussion suggests that while the outside of the pistols will look familiar, the V series may incorporate updated internal mechanisms, representing a new approach to Glock’s long-standing striker-fired design.
The hosts reiterate that the slim models, including the Glock 48, 43X, and 43, are not part of the discontinuation and will continue as usual for those who prefer thinner carry pistols. For users of full-size, compact, and subcompact double-stack Glocks, the V models are presented as the path forward, offering similar function and utility with potential internal refinements. They highlight that the Glock 44 in .22 LR, which some had largely forgotten, is also receiving a V-line update. This inclusion signals that Glock still views the .22 LR Glock 44 as an important training and practice option within its broader lineup.
The discussion moves to what this means for older generations and the secondary market. The hosts remind viewers that Glock previously phased out Gen 4 production, so discontinuing additional models is consistent with past behavior. They stress that millions of existing pistols remain in circulation, including police trade-ins and used Glocks, ensuring that older configurations will stay available. Enthusiasts who favor Gen 3 frames, customization, and accessories from companies like Strike Industries will still find plenty of options. They also note that owners in restrictive states with roster systems may face delays before new V models appear on approved lists, which could complicate purchases in those regions for some time.
The hosts speculate about what Glock’s internal changes might signal for the future. They suggest that the V models could be a stepping stone toward a potential Gen 6 line or more modular designs that might allow easier retrofitting or configuration changes. While they emphasize that this is only speculation, they see Glock’s willingness to revise internals while keeping the external profile familiar as a sign that the company is preparing for more advanced features. The idea is that a pistol that looks like the classic Glock could eventually incorporate new technology inside, reflecting broader trends in modern handgun design without abandoning the recognizable Glock silhouette.
In closing, the hosts consider how the announcement may affect the market. Initial reactions included surprise and strong emotions, with some owners saying they might hold the decision against Glock. The hosts doubt that sentiment will last, arguing that Glock is acting to protect its position in the modern handgun landscape while maintaining dependability. They predict increased demand for discontinued and legacy models, especially MOS versions and other configurations that will no longer be produced. Those interested in owning these older designs are encouraged to act before supplies tighten. The conversation frames the outgoing pistols as “legacy models” that will likely remain sought after even as the V series becomes Glock’s new standard.
Loading... 
