The hosts, Kai and Jason, are at Blackstone Shooting Sports, an indoor range in the Carolinas, on a rainy Charlotte morning. They are using a low-light bay to compare a Pard Lannet 480C thermal optic against a Holosun DRS digital night vision unit. Each host mounts one of the optics and shoots in a nearly pitch-black environment to see how they perform when there is little to no visible light. Even when there is no obvious heat signature on one of the targets, the shooter running the thermal notes that he can still see and engage it. The shooter using the digital night vision comments that, despite the bay being essentially pitch black and the optic having a relatively small viewing window, he can still clearly see a usable image and hit his targets. After this brief live-fire segment, they decide to head back to the studio to break down what they observed and to explain how each technology works, where each shines, and what tradeoffs matter when choosing between them.
Back in the studio, Kai asks Jason, who is an experienced night vision user, to explain what night vision is and how it works. Jason describes night vision as a system that takes ambient light in the environment and amplifies it roughly a thousandfold. Photons are collected and converted through a photocathode, then intensified and projected as an image the user can see. He notes that there are multiple generations of night vision, and that early work was done by both German and U.S. engineers. Those early systems were crude by modern standards, with very large housings and huge objective lenses needed to gather enough light. During the Vietnam era, second-generation devices represented a major step forward, and later developments led to the more familiar Gen 2 and Gen 3 equipment used today. Over time, the technology shrank from massive, rifle-mounted scopes to compact platforms like PVS-14 monoculars, clip-on units that mount in front of day optics, and high-end binocular or quad-tube setups. Modern units are small and light enough to mount directly on firearms or helmets. Jason also points out that night vision still depends on some level of ambient light; in a completely dark space with no photons to amplify, the user will see little more than noise. Techniques like placing the device in a lightless box can help clear temporary image artifacts or burns from bright light exposure.
The conversation shifts to thermal technology, using the Pard Lannet 480C from the range segment as an example. Unlike night vision, which amplifies existing light, thermal devices detect differences in temperature and convert that information into a digital image. The Pard unit is a standalone optic weighing around 720 grams, or about 25 ounces, and functions much like a digital camera that is tuned to heat instead of visible light. As with other digital imaging systems, picture quality degrades as the user zooms in because the device is essentially enlarging pixels rather than gathering more detail optically. Thermal optics offer multiple display palettes such as white hot, black hot, and various color modes that can make temperature contrasts easier to interpret in different environments. These devices are widely used for hunting, security work, and certain close-quarters tasks, especially in modern conflict settings where being able to see warm targets in darkness is critical. When scanning a dark field, thermal does not brighten the entire scene the way a flashlight or illuminator would; instead, it quickly reveals warm objects like people or animals as distinct shapes, even when they are partially obscured by vegetation or shadows. The hosts stress that the goal is not to crown a single winner, but to understand which technology is better suited to particular roles.
Jason and Kai compare traditional analog night vision tubes with newer digital systems like the Holosun DRS. Analog performance is influenced by factors such as the F-number of the optics and the signal-to-noise ratio of the tube, and high-end tubes can sometimes punch through certain camouflage patterns or light foliage better than cheaper units. Digital night vision, by contrast, is constrained by how much light reaches its sensor; once that threshold is met, improvements in tube quality are not a factor because the system is fundamentally electronic. Both the digital night vision unit and the thermal optic used in their test have practical effective ranges, but neither is portrayed as a magic 1,000-yard solution. Real-world performance depends heavily on environmental conditions, the specific equipment, and the user’s skill. They mention a previous bolt-gun project where one shooter ran a clip-on thermal in front of a day scope while others used night vision, and they observed that each technology had clear strengths and weaknesses depending on the target type, distance, and scenario.
Drawing from that earlier bolt-gun project, the hosts explain that the shooter using a clip-on thermal found it more difficult to see steel targets until repeated hits warmed the metal enough to stand out. Meanwhile, the shooters using night vision had an easier time once the targets were illuminated or had some light reflecting off them. However, thermal excelled at spotting animals and movement across the field, such as quickly picking up a rabbit running in the distance. Night vision tends to improve overall visibility of a field, making terrain and structures easier to interpret, but it can struggle to reveal stationary or well-camouflaged targets, especially if they are behind brush or partially hidden. Thermal, on the other hand, can detect the warmth of game animals like hogs or deer even when they are tucked into vegetation, making it particularly attractive for many hunting applications. It is also valuable for quickly locating warm targets in large, dark areas, even though it does not provide the same kind of detailed scene illumination that night vision offers.
The hosts then focus on identification and team coordination. Night vision can see infrared markers, strobes, and illuminators, which allows users to mark friendlies, designate targets, and highlight points of interest without visible light. This capability is extremely useful for coordinating movements in a team environment and for avoiding confusion about who is who in the dark. Thermal devices generally cannot see these infrared cues, so people often appear as similar heat silhouettes with fewer distinguishing details. Jason recounts a shoot-house style event at the Gundies where one participant used a thermal device. Thermal made it easy to see people inside the structure, but it also contributed to a friendly fire incident: a teammate, seeing only another warm outline, mistakenly engaged the user with a full-auto gel blaster, thinking he was an opposing player. This story illustrates that while thermal is excellent for detection, it can complicate positive identification when multiple people are in close proximity and there are no clear markers to differentiate friend from foe.
They move on to specific weaknesses of thermal imaging. One major limitation is glass: when looking through a window, vehicle windshield, or similar barrier, a thermal optic often reflects its own image or shows a uniform temperature surface instead of revealing what is behind it. In a demonstration with a shooter named Brandon, the glass initially appeared completely dark through the thermal device, and the person standing behind it was invisible. When Brandon pressed his hand against the glass, the thermal unit slowly revealed the outline of his hand as the glass warmed up, but it still did not show his full body behind the window. The hosts note that other materials and techniques, such as reflective blankets, can also significantly reduce or mask thermal signatures. Night vision is less affected by these particular countermeasures because it can see through glass and is not dependent on heat, though terrain, weather, and ambient light levels can still limit what the user can see.
To wrap up, the hosts consider which system makes more sense for roles like hunting or protecting a property. They emphasize that the choice depends on the user’s priorities rather than a simple winner-takes-all verdict. Thermal offers strong advantages for detecting animals or people by their heat, especially when they are partially concealed or spread out across open fields at night. Night vision, by contrast, provides better overall scene awareness, the ability to use and see infrared markers and illuminators, and more reliable identification of friendlies in a team setting. When asked to pick only one, the more experienced night vision user leans toward night vision because of its versatility and identification benefits. At the same time, they acknowledge that many shooters and hunters may ultimately benefit from having access to both technologies, or from fusion-style systems that blend elements of thermal and night vision into a single platform.
Loading...