Industry-leading prices on quality products. Check out what's on sale today!
SHOP NOWClassic Firearms breaks down the allegedly leaked Glock AR-15 style rifle said to be destined for British special forces. The discussion focuses on design details, patents, and how the photos compare to existing military carbines.
The conversation opens with discussion of long-running rumors that Glock would eventually release a rifle. Instead of another Glock 19 variant, the focus is on an alleged 5.56 AR-15 style platform reportedly developed for British special forces. The hosts emphasize that nothing is confirmed and repeatedly frame everything as alleged and speculative. They note that Glock rifle rumors have circulated for years, but the appearance of new photos has renewed interest. Initial expectations were for something like a Glock pistol with a 16-inch barrel and stock, but the leaked images suggest a full rifle platform, prompting a closer look at whether the gun could be real.
Attention turns to the leaked photos themselves, said to have come from a former British soldier with friends allegedly involved in the program. The hosts argue that certain details make a simple fake less likely. The rifle appears as part of a complete weapon system, including a suppressor, similar to how SIG provides an integrated system for the U.S. military. At the end of the suppressor, there is also a flash hider, which they find unusual but telling. They suggest that a low-effort hoax would probably not combine a suppressor and a flash hider in this way, since that requires more specific knowledge of modern military configurations and existing suppressor designs.
The hosts then analyze the rail system visible in the photos. They point out a small ledge over the suppressor and question whether a casual faker would bother to design or Photoshop such a feature. They reference Glock patents from around 2018 that describe a rail with seven M-LOK slots around the handguard. The visible M-LOK layout in the leaked images appears to match those patent drawings, which they see as adding credibility. They stress that these patents are publicly accessible and that several elements from them seem to be appearing in the alleged rifle, suggesting a continuity between Glock’s earlier design work and what is seen in the photos.
Underneath the rail, the rifle appears to use a direct impingement gas system rather than a piston setup. The hosts say that zooming in reveals what looks like an adjustable DI system, which contrasts with piston-driven military rifles like the SIG Spear or HK416 and HK417. They speculate that DI may have been part of the contract requirements, while noting that adjustable gas systems are increasingly common on the U.S. commercial market. They discuss how the gas adjustment might be accessed, suggesting the rail may need to be removed. A quick-detach ratcheting mechanism at the bottom of the rail could allow the handguard to come off so the gas system can be tuned, though they question how practical that would be in the field.
Comparisons are made between the alleged Glock rail and existing military-style rails. The handguard is said to resemble a Geissele Mk16 rail used on military carbines, which fits the idea of a contract-focused design. The rail also appears to include a reinforced QD sling point on the side, similar to what Daniel Defense achieves with an M-LOK QD insert on its rifles. They note small indexing tangs that wrap around the receiver, a feature seen on various modern rails. However, the receiver itself stands out: instead of a typical rounded AR-15 upper, it appears to be a flat-sided, reinforced design. The hosts argue that matching a unique rail to a matching nonstandard receiver would be a lot of work for a hoax, again suggesting more than a casual mockup.
The discussion shifts to the rifle’s controls. The photos seem to show ambidextrous safety selectors, an ambidextrous bolt release, and an ambidextrous magazine release, in addition to the standard mag release. The hosts connect this to a broader trend in U.S. military small arms, mentioning platforms like the SIG Spear and noting that companies such as ADM were early adopters of fully ambidextrous AR controls. They see this as an example of civilian market innovation influencing military requirements. Features that gun owners have pushed for—such as mirrored controls for left- and right-handed use—now appear to be migrating into potential service rifles, which they view as a notable shift in how battlefield ergonomics are shaped.
Finally, they focus on branding visible in the images. The dust cover on the alleged rifle appears to carry a Glock emblem, and they claim there are multiple Glock logos on each side of the gun, including on the handguard, receiver, and grip. One host mentions zooming in on the grip and being about 98 percent sure the blurred marking is a Glock logo, noting that the outline of the “G” can be made out despite the low resolution. They joke about the potential for heavily branded aftermarket parts and parody the idea of a commercial touting extra logos on every component. Even while keeping the tone light, they use the consistent Glock markings as another detail that would require deliberate effort to fake convincingly.
Loading... 
