The video opens by defining what qualifies a rifle as a bullpup, focusing on the relationship between the trigger group and the chamber. A bullpup places the chamber, action, and ejection system behind the trigger, allowing a full-length barrel in a much shorter overall package. This configuration keeps the rifle compact without sacrificing ballistic performance associated with longer barrels. The host explains how this layout shifts the rifle’s balance point closer to the shooter’s body, affecting handling, recoil perception, and how the gun is shouldered in confined spaces. The concept is framed as a design solution for modern tactical and defensive roles where maneuverability is critical. With this foundation, the video sets up a direct comparison between two well-known 5.56 bullpup platforms, the Steyr AUG A3 and the IWI Tavor X95, using the bullpup definition as the lens for evaluating their design choices and control layouts.
Attention turns to the Steyr AUG A3, a classic 5.56 bullpup that traces its roots back to the 1970s. The rifle is presented as one of the earliest and most recognizable bullpup service rifles, with a distinctive profile and long-standing military pedigree. The host notes that this A3 variant incorporates modern updates while retaining the core AUG architecture. A key point is the non-ambidextrous charging handle located on the left side, which influences how right- and left-handed shooters run the gun. The AUG A3 features integrated Picatinny rail sections, replacing the older fixed optic housing and allowing users to mount contemporary optics and accessories. Its polymer chassis and modular design are highlighted as part of the rifle’s enduring appeal. This chapter establishes the AUG A3 as a benchmark bullpup, setting the stage for comparing its older design philosophy to newer bullpup concepts.
The discussion of the Steyr AUG A3 continues with a closer look at how it handles on the range. The rifle’s recoil characteristics are described as notably good, with the bullpup layout and weight distribution helping to keep the muzzle controllable during rapid fire. The host points out the AUG’s unique QD sling placement, which differs from more conventional AR-style sling mounting and affects how the rifle hangs and transitions between shoulders. The integrated Picatinny rail sections are revisited in the context of practical setup, enabling the mounting of optics, lights, and other accessories without extensive aftermarket modification. The non-ambidextrous left-side charging handle is discussed in terms of manipulation techniques, emphasizing that while functional, it is less flexible for left-handed shooters compared to more modern ambidextrous systems. Overall, this segment paints the AUG A3 as a smooth-shooting, proven bullpup with some dated ergonomic choices.
The focus shifts to the IWI Tavor X95, presented as a more modern evolution of the bullpup concept. Chambered in 5.56, the X95 is designed with AR-style ergonomics to ease the transition for shooters familiar with AR-15 controls. The rifle features an ambidextrous, non-reciprocating charging handle, a major departure from the AUG’s fixed left-side handle. This allows more flexible manipulation from either side of the rifle. The magazine release and safety selector are laid out in a way that closely mimics AR-15 patterns, reducing the learning curve and making reloads and safety manipulation feel familiar. The host emphasizes that this AR-like control scheme is a key selling point of the X95, blending bullpup compactness with ergonomics many shooters already know. The X95 is framed as a contemporary answer to the classic AUG, prioritizing user-friendly controls and modularity.
The Tavor X95’s external features are examined in more detail, highlighting its emphasis on modularity and accessory mounting. Around the handguard, the rifle incorporates extensive Picatinny rail sections that are covered from the factory, allowing users to expose only the segments needed for lights, grips, or other accessories. This design keeps the rifle sleek and snag-resistant while preserving mounting flexibility. The X95 in this comparison runs a 16-inch barrel, maintaining full-length 5.56 performance within a compact bullpup footprint. It is equipped with a standard A2 flash hider, making it compatible with common muzzle devices and many suppressor mounting systems. These features underscore the X95’s modern orientation, aimed at shooters who want a configurable, duty-ready bullpup that integrates easily with current optics, lights, and muzzle accessories, while still benefiting from the inherent compactness of the bullpup layout.
With both rifles introduced, the video moves into a direct comparison of their ergonomics and control layouts. The Steyr AUG A3’s non-ambidextrous left-side charging handle is contrasted with the Tavor X95’s ambidextrous, non-reciprocating handle, highlighting how the X95 offers more flexibility for different shooting positions and handedness. The AUG’s more traditional bullpup controls are compared to the X95’s AR-style magazine release and safety selector, which many shooters find more intuitive and faster to operate. The host discusses how each rifle feels when performing reloads, manipulating the safety, and running the charging handle under realistic conditions. Differences in rail placement and accessory mounting options are also touched on, reinforcing how the X95 leans toward modern AR-like ergonomics while the AUG retains its classic, somewhat more specialized control scheme. This segment helps viewers understand how each platform might fit their preferred handling style.
The comparison continues with a focus on ambidexterity and ejection. Both the Steyr AUG A3 and the IWI Tavor X95 are configured as right-side ejecting rifles in this test, but the host notes that each can be converted to left-hand ejection by swapping to a different bolt and making corresponding setup changes. This capability is important for left-handed shooters or those who want more flexibility in unconventional shooting positions. The video also touches on the pop culture presence of both rifles, noting how the AUG and Tavor have appeared in movies, video games, and media, contributing to their recognition and appeal. This broader context helps explain why these two models are often compared and why shooters are curious about their real-world performance beyond their on-screen reputations. The segment rounds out the practical and cultural factors that influence a buyer’s choice between these bullpup platforms.
In the closing portion, the host broadens the discussion beyond the Steyr AUG A3 and IWI Tavor X95 by mentioning additional bullpup rifles such as the Helien and the MDRX as potential future comparison candidates. It is emphasized that the rifles in this particular video were not run with suppressors, so all observations are based on unsuppressed shooting. The idea of equipping these bullpups with silencers is raised as a fun and informative follow-up, with the suggestion of a dedicated comparison focused on suppressed performance, gas behavior, and handling. Viewers are invited to comment if they would like to see the AUG, Tavor X95, and possibly other bullpups like the MDRX and Helien tested side by side with silencers. The segment repeatedly encourages feedback in the comment section to gauge interest in expanded, suppressed bullpup comparison content.
Loading...