Industry-leading prices on quality products. Check out what's on sale today!
SHOP NOWThe team closes out the bolt gun series by breaking down real-world performance of two .308 rifles. They compare handling, recoil, accuracy, and how each platform behaved across the series challenges.
The episode opens with the Classic Firearms crew—Clint, Matt, Ryan, and Kaia—gathered to close out the bolt gun series. They explain that this final installment focuses on discussion rather than live shooting, using their experiences from the previous challenges to evaluate each rifle. The goal is to walk through how the rifles actually performed, what worked, and what did not, based on the entire series. They start by clearing the table and bringing up the first rifle, setting the stage for a detailed breakdown of setups, performance in different drills, and how each platform stacked up against the others.
The first rifle discussed is the Savage Axis II chambered in .308. It is configured with a lightweight polymer stock and an Allen bipod. The rifle comes with a Bushnell 4–12x adjustable scope, and the team also mounts an AGM Neith night vision unit, which is shared across the next two rifles but highlighted here as part of the package. The Axis II uses an adjustable AccuTrigger, which the group describes as a very good trigger for the platform. They emphasize that this rifle is designed and priced as a hunting rifle for everyday shooters rather than as a dedicated precision rifle, framing expectations for its performance in the series.
Matt recounts his performance with the Savage Axis II throughout the series. His initial grouping was the worst of the group at roughly 3–3.5 MOA, while others were closer to half-MOA, but he notes the rifle’s intended role as a hunting gun where that level of accuracy is acceptable. The team jokes about calling it “minute of deer” rather than minute of angle. As the challenges progressed, Matt improved, moving up in placement in later events, though he finished last in the night vision shoot despite the AGM Neith working well. He stresses that the rifle proved dependable and capable when he did his part, and that any shortcomings in the final challenge were on the shooter, not the rifle or its lower price point compared to the much more expensive rifles in the lineup.
The group then focuses on how the Savage Axis II’s lightweight polymer stock affects handling. They note that the low weight is an advantage for hunting or carrying the rifle over distance, especially with a sling, but it also leads to more noticeable hop and recoil in the challenges. Shooters had to work harder to keep the rifle stable under rapid fire. They discuss that swapping to a heavier stock or chassis, or adding competition weights, could improve stability and mounting options. Observing each other on the range, they found the rifle surprisingly accurate for its role during the first few rounds, but performance degraded as the barrel heated. They joke about struggling to hit targets after extended strings, while acknowledging that early shots were consistently on target and that the rifle often exceeded expectations relative to its cost.
Next, the team brings out the Bergara B14 HMR Carbon Wilderness, also in 7.62/.308. Clint notes that his results with this rifle during the series did not match his expectations, even though the rifle itself met what he wanted to see in terms of features. Starting at the muzzle, they highlight the Omni brake, which they compare directly to the Savage Axis II since both are .308. The brake and the more ergonomic stock provide noticeably better recoil management and a more comfortable shooting experience. The carbon fiber–wrapped barrel keeps overall weight down, and the stock design offers improved ergonomics over traditional hunting stocks, setting the Bergara apart as a more refined precision-oriented platform in the lineup.
They describe the Bergara B14 HMR Carbon Wilderness as very accurate from a cold bore, especially during team drills at around 450 yards where Clint was consistently getting hits. However, they observed that the lighter, carbon fiber–wrapped barrel seemed to lose accuracy more quickly as it heated up. Before filming, Clint fired about ten consecutive shots with solid impacts, then saw performance drop off once the barrel warmed significantly. During the team run, shots began to wander, leading him to chase impacts with scope adjustments. He later realized he had been adjusting to a hot barrel, so when it cooled, his zero was off. The takeaway was to zero with small shot strings—three rounds, then cool—rather than long, continuous strings, and to avoid chasing a shifting point of impact caused by heat.
The Bergara is equipped with a first focal plane 3–18x optic that the team had previously tested in a “Is your scope lying to you?” segment. They found that this scope tracked accurately and did not introduce errors, which they appreciated for precision work. A Harris bipod is mounted up front for stability. One recurring issue involved the Bergara magazine: after roughly 50–60 rounds, the magazine began dropping out under recoil unless it was held firmly in place. Clint describes feeling a lack of resistance when cycling the bolt, indicating the rifle was not picking up rounds properly, likening it humorously to a “hot dog through a hallway.” Aside from that, the B14 action is described as very smooth, with reliable extraction and ejection except for a single questionable instance that Clint attributes to user error. The trigger and stock both receive positive comments.
Matt compares the Bergara B14 HMR Carbon Wilderness directly to the Savage Axis II, since both are .308 rifles. He notes that the Omni brake not only reduces felt recoil but also helps keep muzzle hop down, making it easier to stay on target. The stock’s more vertical, pistol-grip style places the wrist in a natural position, reducing strain and allowing shooters to maintain a stable hold longer, which they describe as important for precision shooting. Matt also points out the advantage of the Bergara’s optic having a full-featured reticle rather than a simple crosshair, enabling more precise holds and adjustments. The conversation closes with light banter about historical marksmen and doing more with less, underscoring that while equipment matters, shooter skill and fundamentals remain central to performance.
Loading... 
